Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBåserud, Line
dc.contributor.authorReuder, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorJonassen, Marius Opsanger
dc.contributor.authorBonin, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorChilson, Phillip B.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Maria A.
dc.contributor.authorDurand, Pierre
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T11:02:44Z
dc.date.available2020-08-07T11:02:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedBåserud L, Reuder J, Jonassen MO, Bonin T, Chilson, Jiménez MA, Durand P. Potential and limitations in estimating sensible-heat-flux profiles from consecutive temperature profiles using remotely-piloted aircraft systems. Boundary-layer Meteorology. 2020;174:145–177eng
dc.identifier.issn1573-1472en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-8314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/23545
dc.description.abstractProfiles of the sensible heat flux are key to understanding atmospheric-boundary-layer (ABL) structure and development. Based on temperature profiling by a remotely-piloted aircraft system (RPAS), the Small Unmanned Meteorological Observer (SUMO) platform, during the Boundary Layer Late Afternoon and Sunset Turbulence (BLLAST) field campaign, 108 heat-flux profiles are estimated using a simplified version of the prognostic equation for potential temperature θ that relates the tendency in θ to the flux divergence over the time span between two consecutive flights. We validate for the first time RPAS-based heat-flux profiles against a network of 12 ground-based eddy-covariance stations (2–60 m above ground), in addition to a comparison with fluxes from a manned aircraft and a tethered balloon, enabling the detailed investigation of the potential and limitations related to this technique for obtaining fluxes from RPAS platforms. We find that appropriate treatment of horizontal advection is crucial for obtaining realistic flux values, and present correction methods specific to the state of the ABL. Advection from a mesoscale model is also tested as another correction method. The SUMO heat-flux estimates with appropriate corrections compare well with the reference measurements, with differences in the performance depending on the time of day, since the evening period shows the best results (94% within the spread of ground stations), and the afternoon period shows the poorest results (63% within the spread). The diurnal cycle of the heat flux is captured by the SUMO platform for several days, with the flux values from the manned aircraft and tethered balloon coinciding well with those from the SUMO platform.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.titlePotential and limitations in estimating sensible-heat-flux profiles from consecutive temperature profiles using remotely-piloted aircraft systemsen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-01-31T15:35:50Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s)en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00478-9
dc.identifier.cristin1748289
dc.source.journalBoundary-layer Meteorology


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY