Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBjorland, Peder Aleksanderen_US
dc.contributor.authorØymar, Knuten_US
dc.contributor.authorErsdal, Hege Langlien_US
dc.contributor.authorRettedal, Sirenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-11T09:18:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-11T09:18:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedBjorland PA, Øymar K, Ersdal HL, Rettedal S. Incidence of newborn resuscitative interventions at birth and short-term outcomes: A regional population-based study. BMJ Paediatrics Open. 2019;3:e000592eng
dc.identifier.issn2399-9772
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/23642
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine the incidence and characteristics of resuscitative interventions at different gestational ages and short-term outcomes after resuscitation. Design, setting and patients: A prospective observational study in an unselected population at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, from October 2016 until September 2017. Interventions: Using a data collection form and video recordings, we registered and analysed resuscitative interventions. Main outcome measures: Incidence of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), positive pressure ventilation (PPV), intubation, chest compressions and intravenous fluid or epinephrine boluses. Short-term outcomes of resuscitated newborns. Results: All 4693 newborns in the study period were included in the study. Two hundred and ninety-one (6.2%) newborns received interventions in the first minutes of life beyond drying and stimulation. PPV was provided in 170 (3.6%) while CPAP (without PPV) was provided in 121 (2.6%) newborns. Duration of PPV was median (IQR) 106 s (54–221). Intubations were performed in 19 (0.4%) newborns, with a mean (SD) intubation time of 47 (21) s. Ten (0.2%) newborns received chest compressions and epinephrine was administrated in three (0.1%) newborns. Sixty-three per cent of the treated newborns from 34 weeks’ gestational age were returned to parental care without further follow-up. Conclusions: The need for resuscitative interventions after birth was frequent in this unselected population in a high-resource setting, but full cardiopulmonary resuscitation was rare. Short-term outcomes were good, suggesting that most newborns treated with resuscitative interventions were not severely affected.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBMJeng
dc.rightsAttribution-Non Commercial CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/eng
dc.titleIncidence of newborn resuscitative interventions at birth and short-term outcomes: A regional population-based studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-02-05T07:36:41Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Authors
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000592
dc.identifier.cristin1780663
dc.source.journalBMJ Paediatrics Open


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-Non Commercial CC BY-NC
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-Non Commercial CC BY-NC