Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKnapstad, Mari Kallanden_US
dc.contributor.authorNordahl, Stein Helgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaterstad, Ingvill Fjellen_US
dc.contributor.authorAsk, Toveen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkouen, Jan Stureen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoplen, Frederik Krageruden_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-11T09:21:21Z
dc.date.available2020-08-11T09:21:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.PublishedKnapstad MK, Nordahl SHG, Naterstad IF, Ask T, Skouen Skouen JS, Goplen F. Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients-The reliability of a pressure algometer. Physiotherapy Research International. 2018;23(4):e1736eng
dc.identifier.issn1358-2267
dc.identifier.issn1471-2865
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/23643
dc.description.abstractObjectives: A tool for measuring neck pain in patients with dizziness is needed to further investigate the relationship between the two symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a hand‐held pressure algometer in measuring pressure pain threshold (PPT) in different cervical regions of dizzy patients. Methods: PPT was measured at two bilateral standardized sites of the neck by a trained physiotherapist in 50 patients with dizziness. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for intrarater and test–retest reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed by measuring the association between PPT and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) tender points at each site and with the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Results: Almost perfect intrarater (ICC = 0.815–0.940) and within‐session test–retest (ICC = 0.854–0.906) reliability was found between the measures. On each site, a low PPT predicted a positive ACR tender point at each site (OR = 0.864–0.922). Last, we found a statistical inverse relationship between the PPT and the NPRS (R = −0.52 to −0.66). Conclusion: The study shows that a pressure algometer is a reliable tool for measuring PPT in the neck of dizzy patients. Further, the PPT correlates significantly with other subjective measures of pain indicating that it may be a useful tool for further research.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWileyeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.titleMeasuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients-The reliability of a pressure algometeren_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-01-17T06:11:11Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2018 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1736
dc.identifier.cristin1614729
dc.source.journalPhysiotherapy Research International


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY