Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSveinsdottir, Vigdis
dc.contributor.authorLie, Stein Atle
dc.contributor.authorBond, Gary R.
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege Randi
dc.contributor.authorTveito, Torill Helene
dc.contributor.authorGrasdal, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorReme, Silje Endresen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-11T12:58:37Z
dc.date.available2020-08-11T12:58:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedSveinsdottir V, Lie SA, Bond GR, Eriksen HR, Tveito TH, Grasdal A, Reme SE. Individual placement and support for young adults at risk of early work disability (the SEED trial). A randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2020;46(1):50-59eng
dc.identifier.issn0355-3140
dc.identifier.issn1795-990X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/23656
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Individual placement and support (IPS) is an effective approach for helping people with severe mental illness gain employment. This study aimed to investigate if IPS can be effectively repurposed to support young adults at risk of early work disability due to various social and health related problems. Methods: A randomized controlled trial including 96 young adults (18‒29 years; 68% men) was conducted in Norway. Participants were not in employment, education, or training, received temporary benefits due to social or health-related problems, and were eligible for traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). Participants were randomized to IPS (N=50) or TVR (N=46). Self-reported data were collected at baseline and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. The primary outcome was obtaining any paid employment in the competitive labor market during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were physical and mental health, well-being, coping, alcohol consumption, and drug use. Results: Significantly more IPS participants obtained competitive employment compared to TVR participants during 12-months follow-up (48% versus 8%; odds ratio 10.39, 95% confidence interval 2.79‒38.68). The IPS group reported significantly better outcomes than the TVR group in subjective health complaints, helplessness, and hopelessness. In post hoc analyses adjusted for baseline and missing data, the IPS group reported significantly better outcomes on these measures in addition to level of disability, optimism about future well-being, and drug use. Conclusions: IPS is effective for young adults at risk of early work disability. IPS was superior to TVR in increasing competitive employment and promoted improvements in some non-vocational outcomes. IPS services should be offered to improve employment rates in this vulnerable group.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherNOROSHeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.titleIndividual placement and support for young adults at risk of early work disability (the SEED trial). A randomized controlled trialeng
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.date.updated2020-01-30T20:23:17Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Healthen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3837
dc.identifier.cristin1740517
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY