Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRoy, James
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-26T13:01:57Z
dc.date.available2020-10-26T13:01:57Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.PublishedIn: Østby, Erik (ed.), Ancient Arcadia 2005: 261-270en_US
dc.identifier.isbn82-91626-25-1
dc.identifier.issn1105-4204
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/24361
dc.descriptionPapers from the third international seminar on Ancient Arcadia, held at the Norwegian Institute at Athens, 7-10 May 2002en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines what can be deduced about the political interplay among Arkadian communities over the planning of the synoikism of Megalopolis, despite the divergence of Diodorus 15.72.4 and Pausanias 8.27.3-4 on the extent of the synoikism. Mantinea renounced any ambition to expand into and beyond northern Mainalia (except possibly for HeJisson), but Tegea was still free to extend its influence over some southern Mainalians. If Methydrion, Thisoa, and Teuthis were detached from Orchomenos as part of the synoikism, that would favour Kleitor and Mantinea. The failure to include Kynuria in the synoikism, as seen from IG V.2, 1, is surprising, but may be because Elis and TriphyJia to the west were friendly at the time. These considerations do not determine whether Diodorus or Pausanias offers the better account of the synoikism, but do show some of the interests at stake.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThe Norwegian Institute at Athensen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPapers of the Norwegian Institute at Athensen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries8en_US
dc.subject.otherCities and towns, Ancient - Greece, Arcadiaen_US
dc.titleSynoikizing Megalopolis: The Scope of the Synoikism and the Interests of Local Arkadian Communitiesen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humaniora: 000::Historie: 070::Oldtidens historie: 080en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel