Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRehn, Mariusen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Jan E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVigerust, Tronden_US
dc.contributor.authorKrüger, Andreas J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLossius, Hans Mortenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-14T09:31:02Z
dc.date.available2011-04-14T09:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-11eng
dc.PublishedBMC Emergency Medicine 10:17en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-227X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/4665
dc.description.abstractBackground Efficient management of major incidents involves triage, treatment and transport. In the absence of a standardised interdisciplinary major incident management approach, the Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation developed Interdisciplinary Emergency Service Cooperation Course (TAS). The TAS-program was established in 1998 and by 2009, approximately 15 500 emergency service professionals have participated in one of more than 500 no-cost courses. The TAS-triage concept is based on the established triage Sieve and Paediatric Triage Tape models but modified with slap-wrap reflective triage tags and paediatric triage stretchers. We evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of the TAS-triage concept in full-scale simulated major incidents. Methods The learners participated in two standardised bus crash simulations: without and with competence of TAS-triage and access to TAS-triage equipment. The instructors calculated triage accuracy and measured time consumption while the learners participated in a self-reported before-after study. Each question was scored on a 7-point Likert scale with points labelled "Did not work" (1) through "Worked excellent" (7). Results Among the 93 (85%) participating emergency service professionals, 48% confirmed the existence of a major incident triage system in their service, whereas 27% had access to triage tags. The simulations without TAS-triage resulted in a mean over- and undertriage of 12%. When TAS-Triage was used, no mistriage was found. The average time from "scene secured to all patients triaged" was 22 minutes (range 15-32) without TAS-triage vs. 10 minutes (range 5-21) with TAS-triage. The participants replied to "How did interdisciplinary cooperation of triage work?" with mean 4,9 (95% CI 4,7-5,2) before the course vs. mean 5,8 (95% CI 5,6-6,0) after the course, p < 0,001. Conclusions Our modified triage Sieve tool is feasible, time-efficient and accurate in allocating priority during simulated bus accidents and may serve as a candidate for a future national standard for major incident triage.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0eng
dc.titleA concept for major incident triage: full-scaled simulation feasibility studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderRehn et al.
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2010 Rehn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227x-10-17
dc.identifier.cristin1041604
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700eng


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY