Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLyse, Gunn Ingereng
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-28T11:05:12Z
dc.date.available2011-04-28T11:05:12Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-28eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/4712
dc.descriptionAppendices to the PhD thesis: Translation-based Word Sense Disambiguation. Data obtained from computational modeling
dc.description.abstractAppendix 1: Norwegian ambiguous lemmas in the ENPC where at least two senses have a frequency greater than or equal to 10. Appendix 2: English ambiguous lemmas in the ENPC where at least two senses have a frequency greater than or equal to 10. Appendix 3: Results from model selection (cross-validation) in Chapter 9 with knowledge source=WORDS. The target words are ordered alphabetically. Evaluated with 5-fold cross validation and Overall Accuracy (measured as total recall). The best accuracy in each group is marked in bold-face (in case of ties, the model with the smallest context window is selected). Appendix 4: Results from model selection (cross-validation) in Chapter 9 with knowledge source=SEMANTIC-FEATURES. The target words are ordered alphabetically. Evaluated with 5-fold cross validation and Overall Accuracy (measured as total recall). The best accuracy in each group is marked in bold-face (in case of ties, the model with the smallest context window is selected). Appendix 5: Results from model selection (cross-validation) in Chapter 9 with knowledge source=RELATED-WORDS. The target words are ordered alphabetically. Evaluated with 5-fold cross validation and Overall Accuracy (measured as total recall). The best accuracy in each group is marked in bold-face (in case of ties, the model with the smallest context window is selected). Appendix 6: Results from model selection (cross-validation) in Chapter 10 with knowledge source=WORDS. The target words are ordered alphabetically. Evaluated with 5-fold cross validation and Overall Accuracy (measured as total recall). The best accuracy in each group is marked in bold-face (in case of ties, the model with the smallest context window is selected). Appendix 7: Results from model selection (cross-validation) in Chapter 10 with knowledge source=SEMANTIC-FEATURES. The target words are ordered alphabetically. Evaluated with 5-fold cross validation and Overall Accuracy (measured as total recall). The best accuracy in each group is marked in bold-face (in case of ties, the model with the smallest context window is selected). Appendix 8: Results from model selection (cross-validation) in Chapter 10 with knowledge source=RELATED-WORDS. The target words are ordered alphabetically. Evaluated with 5-fold cross validation and Overall Accuracy (measured as total recall). The best accuracy in each group is marked in bold-face (in case of ties, the model with the smallest context window is selected).en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/5731" target="blank">Translation-based Word Sense Disambiguation</a>eng
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SAeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/eng
dc.subjectWord sense disambiguationeng
dc.titleTranslation-based Word Sense Disambiguation: Appendiceseng
dc.typeOther
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2011 Gunn Inger Lyse. Permissions granted under Creative Commons (Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)).
dc.rights.holderGunn Inger Lyseeng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SA
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SA