Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmos, Linda Marieeng
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-06T08:43:10Z
dc.date.available2012-03-06T08:43:10Z
dc.date.issued2011-11-28eng
dc.date.submitted2011-11-28eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/5693
dc.description.abstractThe appearance of modern human behaviour in Europe has been the focus of many discussions throughout the past few decades. The sudden explosion" (Mellars 1996) of symbolic artefacts after ~40 000 BP (before present) in European sites has given rise to several models describing the entrance of a behaviourally and anatomically modern population to the continent. Though recent discoveries and re-analysis of older data from both Europe and Africa have shown that the Upper Palaeolithic (UP) transition may not have been the revolution it once was thought to be (McBrearty and Brooks 2000, d'Errico 2003), certain prejudices seem to linger.en_US
dc.format.extent6033129 byteseng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherThe University of Bergeneng
dc.subjectNeanderthaleng
dc.subjectUpper Palaeolithic,eng
dc.title'Them' or 'Us§? A Question of Cognition: The Case for Neanderthal Modernity.eng
dc.typeMaster thesis
dc.description.degreeMaster i Arkeologi
dc.description.localcodeMAHF-ARK
dc.description.localcodeARK350
dc.subject.nus713306eng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humanities: 000::Archeology: 090
fs.subjectcodeARK350


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record