Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStavelin, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeijer, Pieten_US
dc.contributor.authorKitchen, Dianneen_US
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-16T10:28:07Z
dc.date.available2013-12-16T10:28:07Z
dc.date.issued2011-09eng
dc.PublishedClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 50(1): 81–88eng
dc.identifier.issn1437-4331
dc.identifier.issn1434-6621
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/7606
dc.description.abstractBackground: Point-of-care testing (POCT) of prothrombin time, expressed as International Normalized Ratio (INR), is widely used to monitor patients in oral anticoagulation treatment. Guidelines recommend that POCT users should participate in an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme whenever available. The aim of this study was to investigate which European countries provide EQA for POCT INR and to compare how these schemes are organized. Methods: Thirty European countries were invited to participate in this study. Those who reported that they provide EQA for POCT INR filled in a questionnaire dealing with different aspects of their schemes. Results: Nineteen countries reported that they do not provide EQA for POCT INR, while 12 organizations from nine countries reported that they provide this service. Most of these countries circulate lyophilized samples with for the participants unknown target values. Samples with certified INR values and procedures using split samples with fresh patient samples are also used. The acceptability limits vary from 15% to 30%, and the total number of samples circulated per year varies from 1 to 12. Most of the countries organize educational activities together with their schemes. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there is a wide variation in the way EQA for POCT INR is performed in Europe and that there are many European countries that do not provide this service. Even though our findings indicate that EQA for POCT INR draws some challenges, especially in providing suitable control materials, participation in such schemes is considered useful.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWalter de Gruytereng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/7607" target="blank">Analytical quality control of INR measurements in primary care</a>eng
dc.subjectAnticoagulation treatmenteng
dc.subjectExternal quality assessmenteng
dc.subjectInternational normalized ratioeng
dc.subjectPoint-of-care testingeng
dc.titleExternal quality assessment of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio (INR) testing in Europeen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2011 by Walter de Gruyter
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.719
dc.identifier.cristin922733
dc.source.journalClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
dc.source.4050
dc.source.141
dc.source.pagenumber81-88


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record