Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorYoung, Svenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLie, Stein Atleen_US
dc.contributor.authorHallan, Geiren_US
dc.contributor.authorZirkle, Lewis G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEngesæter, Lars B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHavelin, Leif Ivaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-10T10:54:14Z
dc.date.available2014-02-10T10:54:14Z
dc.date.issued2011-12eng
dc.PublishedActa Orthopaedica 82(6): 737–743eng
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/7775
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) supplies intramedullary (IM) nails for the treatment of long bone fractures free of charge to hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Most operations are reported to the SIGN Online Surgical Database (SOSD). Follow-up has been reported to be low, however. We wanted to examine the pattern of follow-up and to assess whether infection rates could be trusted. Patients and methods: The SOSD contained 36,454 IM nail surgeries in 55 LMICs. We excluded humerus and hip fractures, and fractures without a registered surgical approach. This left 34,361 IM nails for analysis. A generalized additive regression model (gam) was used to explore the association between follow-up rates and infection rates. Results: The overall follow-up rate in the SOSD was 18.1% (95% CI: 17.7–18.5) and national follow-up rates ranged from 0% to 74.2%. The overall infection rate was 0.7% (CI: 0.6–0.8) for femoral fractures and 1.2% (CI: 1.0–1.4) for tibial fractures. If only nails with a registered follow-up visit were included (n = 6,224), infection rates were 3.5% (CI: 3.0–4.1) for femoral fractures and 7.3% (CI: 6.2–8.4) for tibial fractures. We found an increase in infection rates with increasing follow-up rates up to a level of 5%. Follow-up above 5% did not result in increased infection rates. Interpretation: Reported infection rates after IM nailing in the SOSD appear to be reliable and could be used for further research. The low infection rates suggest that IM nailing is a safe procedure also in low- and middle-income countries.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherInforma Healthcareeng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/7782" target="blank">Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in Low-Income Countries. Follow-up, Infections and HIV</a>eng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.titleLow infection rates after 34,361 intramedullary nail operations in 55 low- and middle-income countries. Validation of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Online Surgical Databaseen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.636680
dc.identifier.cristin905141
dc.source.journalActa Orthopaedica
dc.source.4082
dc.source.146
dc.source.pagenumber737-743


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC