Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPsaki, Stephanieen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeidman, Jessicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorGottlieb, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBhutta, Zulfiqar A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Tahmeeden_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, A. M. Shamsiren_US
dc.contributor.authorBessong, Pascalen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Sushil M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKang, Gagandeepen_US
dc.contributor.authorKosek, Margareten_US
dc.contributor.authorLima, Aldoen_US
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Prakash S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSvensen, Erlingen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheckley, Williamen_US
dc.contributor.authorMAL-ED Network Investigatorsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-22T13:40:44Z
dc.date.available2014-09-22T13:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-21eng
dc.identifier.issn1478-7954
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8520
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is no standardized approach to comparing socioeconomic status (SES) across multiple sites in epidemiological studies. This is particularly problematic when cross-country comparisons are of interest. We sought to develop a simple measure of SES that would perform well across diverse, resource-limited settings. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 800 children aged 24 to 60 months across eight resource-limited settings. Parents were asked to respond to a household SES questionnaire, and the height of each child was measured. A statistical analysis was done in two phases. First, the best approach for selecting and weighting household assets as a proxy for wealth was identified. We compared four approaches to measuring wealth: maternal education, principal components analysis, Multidimensional Poverty Index, and a novel variable selection approach based on the use of random forests. Second, the selected wealth measure was combined with other relevant variables to form a more complete measure of household SES. We used child height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) as the outcome of interest. Results: Mean age of study children was 41 months, 52% were boys, and 42% were stunted. Using cross-validation, we found that random forests yielded the lowest prediction error when selecting assets as a measure of household wealth. The final SES index included access to improved water and sanitation, eight selected assets, maternal education, and household income (the WAMI index). A 25% difference in the WAMI index was positively associated with a difference of 0.38 standard deviations in HAZ (95% CI 0.22 to 0.55). Conclusions: Statistical learning methods such as random forests provide an alternative to principal components analysis in the development of SES scores. Results from this multicountry study demonstrate the validity of a simplified SES index. With further validation, this simplified index may provide a standard approach for SES adjustment across resource-limited settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0eng
dc.subjectSocioeconomic statuseng
dc.subjectChild growtheng
dc.subjectClassification, Measurementeng
dc.titleMeasuring socioeconomic status in multicountry studies: results from the eight-country MAL-ED studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2014-04-09T15:09:12Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 Psaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderStephanie R Psaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber8
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-12-8
dc.identifier.cristin1161965
dc.source.journalPopulation Health Metrics
dc.source.4012


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY