Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMoyano, Bernardoeng
dc.contributor.authorSpikes, Kyle Thomaseng
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Tor Arneeng
dc.contributor.authorMondol, Nazmul Haqueeng
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-30T10:36:06Z
dc.date.available2014-10-30T10:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2012-09eng
dc.identifier.issn0016-8033en_US
dc.identifier.issn1942-2156en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8694
dc.description.abstractModeling the elastic properties of clay-bearing rocks (shales) requires thorough knowledge of the mineral constituents, their elastic properties, pore space microstructure, and orientations of clay platelets. Information about these variables and their complex interrelationships is rarely available for real rocks. We theoretically modeled the elastic properties of synthetic clay-water composites compacted in the laboratory, including estimates of pore space topology and percolation behavior. The mineralogy of the samples was known exactly, and the focus was on two monomineralic samples comprised of kaolinite and smectite. We used differential effective medium theory (DEM) and analysis of scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the compacted kaolinite and smectite samples. Percolation behavior was included through calculations of critical porosities from measurements of the liquid limits of the individual clay powders. Quantitative analysis of the SEM images showed that the large scale (>0.1 μm) pore space of the smectite composite had more rounded pores (mean aspect ratio α = 0.55) than the kaolinite composite (mean pore’s aspect ratio α = 0.44). However, models that used only these largescale pore shapes could not explain the compressional and shear velocity measurements. DEM simulations with a single pore aspect ratio showed that bulk and shear moduli are controlled by different pore shapes. Conversely, modeling results that combined critical porosity and dual porosity models into DEM theory compared well with the measured bulk and shear moduli of compacting kaolinite and smectite composites. The methods and results we used could be used to model unconsolidated clay-bearing rocks of more complex mineralogy.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSociety of Exploration Geophysicistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/8703" target="blank">Static and dynamic elastic behaviour of siliciclastic reservoir rocks</a>en_US
dc.titleModeling compaction effects on the elastic properties of clay-water compositesen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2012 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. All rights reserved, use is subject to SEG terms of use and conditions.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0426.1
dc.identifier.cristin940240
dc.source.journalGeophysics
dc.source.4077
dc.source.145
dc.source.pagenumberD171-D183


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel