• Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing? 

      Magelssen, Morten; Bærøe, Kristine (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2019-12-19)
      Background Rationing and allocation decisions at the clinical level – bedside rationing – entail complex dilemmas that clinicians and managers often find difficult to handle. There is a lack of mechanisms and aids for ...
    • Fastlegers reservasjonsadgang – hyklersk eller velbegrunnet? 

      Magelssen, Morten; Langeland, Gard Olav (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2014)
      In the Norwegian debate about General Practitioners’ (GP) right to conscientious objection to referrals for abortion, some claimed that the GPs’ request was self-contradictory and inadequately justified. It was claimed ...
    • Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: A national study of clinical ethics committees 

      Magelssen, Morten; Pedersen, Reidar; Miljeteig, Ingrid; Ervik, Håvard; Førde, Reidun (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2020)
      Background: Case consultation performed by clinical ethics committees (CECs) is a complex activity which should be evaluated. Several evaluation studies have reported stakeholder satisfaction in single institutions. The ...
    • Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting 

      Magelssen, Morten; Miljeteig, Ingrid; Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2017-12-01)
      Background: Fair prioritization of healthcare resources has been on the agenda for decades, but resource allocation dilemmas in clinical practice remain challenging. Can clinical ethics committees (CECs) be of help? The ...