Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHofstad, Håkonen_US
dc.contributor.authorGjelsvik, Bente Elisabeth Bassøeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNæss, Halvoren_US
dc.contributor.authorEide, Geir Egilen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkouen, Jan Stureen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Stroke causes lasting disability and the burden of stroke is expected to increase substantially during the next decades. Optimal rehabilitation is therefore mandatory. Early supported discharge (ESD) has previously shown beneficial, but all major studies were carried out more than ten years ago. We wanted to implement and study the results of ESD in our community today with comparisons between ESD and treatment as usual, as well as between two different ESD models. Methods: Patients with acute stroke were included during a three year period (2008–11) in a randomised controlled study comparing two different ESD models to treatment as usual. The two ESD models differed by the location of treatment: either in a day unit or in the patients’ homes. Patients in the ESD groups were followed by a multi-disciplinary ambulatory team in the stroke unit and discharged home as early as possible. The ESD models also comprised treatment by a multi-disciplinary community health team for up to five weeks and follow-up controls after 3 and 6 months. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at six months. Results: Three-hundred-and-six patients were included. mRS scores and change scores were non-significantly better in the two ESD groups at 3 and 6 months. Within-group improvement from baseline to 3 months was significant in the ESD 1 (p = 0.042) and ESD 2 (p = 0.001) groups, but not in the controls. More patients in the pooled ESD groups were independent at 3 (p = 0.086) and 6 months (p = 0.122) compared to controls and there also was a significant difference in 3 month change score between them (p = 0.049). There were no differences between the two ESD groups. Length of stay in the stroke unit was 11 days in all groups. Conclusions: Patients in the ESD groups tended to be more independent than controls at 3 and 6 months, but no clear statistically significant differences were found. The added effect of supported discharge and improved follow-up seems to be rather modest. The improved stroke treatment of today may necessitate larger patient samples to demonstrate additional benefit of ESD.en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="" target="blank">Early Supported Discharge after stroke in Bergen</a>
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trialeng
dc.subjectEarly supported dischargeeng
dc.subjectCommunity rehabilitationeng
dc.titleEarly supported discharge after stroke in Bergen (ESD Stroke Bergen): three and six months results of a randomised controlled trial comparing two early supported discharge schemes with treatment as usualen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 Hofstad et al.; licensee BioMed Central
dc.rights.holderHåkon Hofstad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.journalBMC Neurology

Tilhørende fil(er)


Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY