Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorØksnes, Marianneen_US
dc.contributor.authorBjörnsdottir, Sigriduren_US
dc.contributor.authorIsaksson, Magnusen_US
dc.contributor.authorMethlie, Paalen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarlsen, Sirien_US
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Roy Miodinien_US
dc.contributor.authorBroman, Jan-Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorTriebner, Kaien_US
dc.contributor.authorKämpe, Olleen_US
dc.contributor.authorHulting, Anna-Lenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBensing, Sophieen_US
dc.contributor.authorHusebye, Eystein Sverreen_US
dc.contributor.authorLøvås, Kristianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T12:53:32Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T12:53:32Z
dc.date.issued2014eng
dc.identifier.issn1945-7197
dc.identifier.issn0021-972X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/9578
dc.description.abstractContext: Conventional glucocorticoid replacement therapy fails to mimic the physiological cortisol rhythm, which may have implications for morbidity and mortality in patients with Addison’s disease. Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of continuous sc hydrocortisone infusion (CSHI) with conventional oral hydrocortisone (OHC) replacement therapy. Design, Patients, and Interventions: This was a prospective crossover, randomized, multicenter clinical trial comparing 3 months of treatment with thrice-daily OHC vs CSHI. From Norway and Sweden, 33 patients were enrolled from registries and clinics. All patients were assessed at baseline and after 8 and 12 weeks in each treatment arm. Main Outcome Measures: The morning ACTH level was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were effects on metabolism, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), sleep, and safety. Results: CSHI yielded normalization of morning ACTH and cortisol levels, and 24-hour salivary cortisol curves resembled the normal circadian variation. Urinary concentrations of glucocorticoid metabolites displayed a normal pattern with CSHI but were clearly altered with OHC. Several HRQoLindices in the vitality domain improved over time with CSHI.Nobenefit was found for either treatments for any subjective (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire) or objective (actigraphy) sleep parameters. Conclusion: CSHI safely brought ACTH and cortisol toward normal circadian levels without adversely affecting glucocorticoid metabolism in the way that OHC did. Positive effects on HRQoL were noted with CSHI, indicating that physiological glucocorticoid replacement therapy may be beneficial and that CSHI might become a treatment option for patients poorly controlled on conventional therapy.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherEndocrine Societyeng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/8326" target="blank">Glucocorticoid Treatment and Quality of Life in Addison’s disease</a>eng
dc.titleContinuous Subcutaneous Hydrocortisone Infusion versus Oral Hydrocortisone Replacement for Treatment of Addison’s Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trialen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 by the Endocrine Society
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-4253
dc.identifier.cristin1165600
dc.source.journalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
dc.source.4099
dc.source.145
dc.source.pagenumber1665-1674


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record