Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBlichner, Lars Christianeng
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-13T11:37:22Z
dc.date.available2015-05-13T11:37:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-31eng
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/9869
dc.description.abstractOn September 2009 the European Union (EU) adopted a regulation banning the import of seal products into the EU or placing seal products on the EU market. The European Parliament was the main driving force behind the regulation and the EU has been criticised by affected countries outside the EU for not basing this decision on the available expert knowledge. The questions asked are how, given epistemic dependence, non-experts may challenge an expert based policy proposal. Can non-experts hold experts accountable, and if so in what way? Three main tests and ten subtests of expert knowledge are proposed and these tests are then used to assess whether the European Parliament did in fact argue in a way consistent with available expert knowledge in amending the Commission proposal for a regulation.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherCogitatioeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectAccountabilityeng
dc.subjectDemocracyeng
dc.subjectepistemic dependenceeng
dc.subjectEuropean Parliamenteng
dc.subjectexpert knowledgeeng
dc.subjectglobalisationeng
dc.subjectseal baneng
dc.titleEpistemic Dependence and the EU Seal Ban Debateeng
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.date.updated2015-04-07T13:30:07Zen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2015 The Authoren_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.80
dc.identifier.cristin1222116
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.403
dc.source.141
dc.source.pagenumber49-60


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY