BORA - UiB

Bergen Open Research Archive

Verifiability of diagnostic categories and work ability in the context of disability pension award: A survey on "gatekeeping" among general practitioners in Norway

Bergen Open Research Archive

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Øverland, Rein
dc.contributor.author Øverland, Simon Nygaard
dc.contributor.author Johansen, Kristian Nyborg
dc.contributor.author Mykletun, Arnstein
dc.date.accessioned 2008-06-09T08:36:57Z
dc.date.available 2008-06-09T08:36:57Z
dc.date.issued 2008-04-25
dc.identifier.citation BMC Public Health 2008, 8:137 en
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2458
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-137
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1956/2706
dc.description.abstract Background Disability benefits exist to redeem social and financial consequences of reduced work ability from medical conditions. Physicians are responsible for identifying the medical grounds for benefit claims. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' views on verifiability of medical conditions and related work ability in this context. Methods Information on verifiability of diagnostic categories and work ability was obtained from a survey among a representative sample of general practitioners (GPs) in Norway (n = 500, 25.2% response rate). Verifiability was defined as to what extent the assessment is based on objective criteria versus on information from the patient. We enquired about the diagnostic categories used in official statistics on main disability benefit causes in Norway and elsewhere. Results On a scale from 0 (low verifiability) to 5 (high verifiability), the mean level of verifiability across all diagnostic categories was 3.7 (SD = 0.42). Degree of verifiability varied much between diagnostic categories, and was low in e.g. unspecified rheumatism/myalgia and dorsopathies, and high in neoplasms and congenital malformations, deformation and chromosomal abnormalities. Verifiability of work ability was reported to be more problematic than that of diagnostic categories. The diagnostic categories rated as the least verifiable, are also the most common in disability pension awards. Conclusion Verifiability of both diagnostic categories and work ability in disability assessments are reported to be moderate by GPs. We suggest that the low verifiability of diagnostic categories and related work ability assessments in the majority of disability pension awards is important in explaining why GPs find the gatekeeping-function problematic. en
dc.language.iso eng en
dc.publisher BioMed Central en
dc.title Verifiability of diagnostic categories and work ability in the context of disability pension award: A survey on "gatekeeping" among general practitioners in Norway en
dc.type Journal article en
dc.type Peer reviewed en
dc.subject.nsi VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801 no
bora.cristinID 336728


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BORA


Browse

My Account