Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReme, Silje Endreseneng
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Eli Moldeeng
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege Randieng
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-16T13:15:07Z
dc.date.available2010-09-16T13:15:07Z
dc.date.issued2009-11-13eng
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 10(139)en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/4188
dc.description.abstractBackground: Brief intervention programs for subacute low back pain (LBP) result in significant reduction of sick leave compared to treatment as usual. Although effective, a substantial proportion of the patients do not return to work. This study investigates predictors of return to work in LBP patients participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing a brief intervention program (BI) with BI and physical exercise. Methods: Predictors for not returning to work was examined in 246 patients sick listed 8-12 weeks for low back pain. The patients had participated in a randomized controlled trial, with BI (n = 122) and BI + physical exercise (n = 124). There were no significant differences between the two intervention groups on return to work. The groups were therefore merged in the analyses of predictors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for non return to work at 3, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. Results: At 3 months of follow-up, the strongest predictors for not returning to work were pain intensity while resting (OR = 5.6; CI = 1.7-19), the perception of constant back strain when working (OR = 4.1; CI = 1.5-12), negative expectations for return to work (OR = 4.2; CI = 1.7-10), and having been to a physiotherapist prior to participation in the trial (OR = 3.3; CI = 1.3-8.3). At 12 months, perceived reduced ability to walk far due to the complaints (OR = 2.6; CI = 1.3-5.4), pain during activities (OR = 2.4; CI = 1.1-5.1), and having been to a physiotherapist prior to participation in the trial (OR = 2.1; CI = 1.1-4.3) were the strongest predictors for non return to work. At 24 months age below 41 years (OR = 2.9; CI = 1.4-6.0) was the only significant predictor for non return to work. Conclusion: It appears that return to work is highly dependant on individual and cognitive factors. Patients not returning to work after the interventions were characterized by negative expectations, perceptions about pain and disability, and previous physiotherapy treatment. This is the first study reporting that previous treatment by physiotherapists is a risk factor for long-term sick leave. This has not been reported before and is an interesting finding that deserves more scrutiny.en
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.titleExpectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back paineng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.typePeer reviewedeng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260nob
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2009 Reme et al; licensee BioMed Central
dc.rights.holderReme et al.eng
dc.type.versionPublished versioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng
bora.cristinID346234eng
bibo.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-139eng
dc.identifier.cristinID346234eng
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-139


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY