Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNjeru, Mercy Karimieng
dc.contributor.authorBlystad, Astrideng
dc.contributor.authorNyamongo, Isaac K.eng
dc.contributor.authorFylkesnes, Knuteng
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-15T08:41:00Z
dc.date.available2011-07-15T08:41:00Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-22eng
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/4839
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: Health, fair financing and responsiveness to the user's needs and expectations are seen as the essential objectives of health systems. Efforts have been made to conceptualise and measure responsiveness as a basis for evaluating the non-health aspects of health systems performance. This study assesses the applicability of the responsiveness tool developed by WHO when applied in the context of voluntary HIV counselling and testing services (VCT) at a district level in Kenya.</p> <p>Methods: A mixed method study was conducted employing a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods concurrently. The questionnaire proposed by WHO was administered to 328 VCT users and 36 VCT counsellors (health providers). In addition to the questionnaire, qualitative interviews were carried out among a total of 300 participants. Observational field notes were also written.</p> <p>Results: A majority of the health providers and users indicated that the responsiveness elements were very important, e.g. confidentiality and autonomy were regarded by most users and health providers as very important and were also reported as being highly observed in the VCT room. However, the qualitative findings revealed other important aspects related to confidentiality, autonomy and other responsiveness elements that were not captured by the WHO tool. Striking examples were inappropriate location of the VCT centre, limited information provided, language problems, and concern about the quality of counselling.</p> <p>Conclusion: The results indicate that the WHO developed responsiveness elements are relevant and important in measuring the performance of voluntary HIV counselling and testing. However, the tool needs substantial revision in order to capture other important dimensions or perspectives. The findings also confirm the importance of careful assessment and recognition of locally specific aspects when conducting comparative studies on responsiveness of HIV testing services.</p>en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0eng
dc.titleA critical assessment of the WHO responsiveness tool: lessons from voluntary HIV testing and counselling services in Kenyaeng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Communicable diseases: 776eng
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2009 Njeru et al; licensee BioMed Central
dc.rights.holderNjeru et al; licensee BioMed Centraleng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng
bora.journalTitleBMC Health Services Researcheng
bibo.volume9eng
bora.cristinID341358eng
bibo.number243eng
bibo.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-243eng
dc.identifier.cristinID341358eng
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-243


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY