Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChipimo, Peter Jayeng
dc.contributor.authorFylkesnes, Knuteng
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-18T14:09:56Z
dc.date.available2011-08-18T14:09:56Z
dc.date.issued2010eng
dc.identifier.citationPractice & Epidemiology in Mental Health 6: 4-15en_US
dc.identifier.issn1745-0179eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/4884
dc.description.abstractBackground: The recognition of mental health as a major contributor to the global burden of disease has led to an increase in the demand for the inclusion of mental health services in primary health care as well as in community-based health surveys in order to improve screening, diagnosis and treatment of mental distress. Many screening instruments are now available. However, the cultural validity of these instruments to detect mental distress has rarely been investigated in developing countries. In these countries, limited trained staff and specialized psychiatric facilities hamper improvement of mental health services. It is therefore imperative to develop a quick, low cost screening instrument that does not require specialized training. We validated different well established screening instruments among primary health care clinic attendees in Lusaka, Zambia. We also assess the face, content and criterion validity of the SRQ’s and determined the most commonly reported symptoms for mental distress. Methods: The screening instruments, SRQ-20, SRQ-10 and GHQ-12 were used as concurrent criteria for each other and compared against a gold standard, DSM-IV. Their correlation, sensitivity and specificity were assessed. All instruments were administered to 400 primary health care clinic attendees. In-depth interviews were also conducted with 28 of these clinic attendees. Results: Both the SRQ-20 and SRQ-10 had high properties for identifying mental distress correctly with an AUC of 0.96 and 0.95 respectively while the GHQ-12 had modest properties (AUC, 0.81). The optimum cut-off points for this population were 7 and 3 for the SRQ and GHQ-12 respectively. The SRQ was also found to have good face and content validity. Conclusion: The study establishes the utility of the SRQ-20 for detecting mental distress cases and also underscores the importance of validating instruments to suit the context of the target population. It also validates the SRQ-10 as the first reliable abbreviated and easy-to-use screening instrument for mental distress in primary health care facilities in Zambia.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBentham Science Publishers Ltd.eng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.subjectMental distresseng
dc.subjectScreening instrumentseng
dc.subjectValidityeng
dc.subjectPrimary healthcareeng
dc.subjectZambiaeng
dc.titleComparative Validity of Screening Instruments for Mental Distress in Zambiaeng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.typePeer reviewedeng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Communicable diseases: 776eng
dc.rights.holderCopyright Chipimo and Fylkesnes; Licensee Bentham Open
dc.rights.holderChipimo and Fylkesnes; Licensee Bentham Openeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC