Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFadnes, Lars Thoreeng
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Debraeng
dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Ingunn Marie S.eng
dc.contributor.authorZembe, Wangaeng
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Davideng
dc.contributor.authorSommerfelt, Halvoreng
dc.contributor.authorTylleskär, Thorkildeng
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-20T12:36:14Z
dc.date.available2012-01-20T12:36:14Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-27eng
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health 2011, 11:404en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/5477
dc.description.abstractBackground: Timely vaccination is important to induce adequate protective immunity. We measured vaccination timeliness and vaccination coverage in three geographical areas in South Africa. Methods: This study used vaccination information from a community-based cluster-randomized trial promoting exclusive breastfeeding in three South African sites (Paarl in the Western Cape Province, and Umlazi and Rietvlei in KwaZulu-Natal) between 2006 and 2008. Five interview visits were carried out between birth and up to 2 years of age (median follow-up time 18 months), and 1137 children were included in the analysis. We used Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis to describe vaccination coverage and timeliness in line with the Expanded Program on Immunization for the first eight vaccines. This included Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), four oral polio vaccines and 3 doses of the pentavalent vaccine which protects against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type B. Results: The proportion receiving all these eight recommended vaccines were 94% in Paarl (95% confidence interval [CI] 91-96), 62% in Rietvlei (95%CI 54-68) and 88% in Umlazi (95%CI 84-91). Slightly fewer children received all vaccines within the recommended time periods. The situation was worst for the last pentavalent- and oral polio vaccines. The hazard ratio for incomplete vaccination was 7.2 (95%CI 4.7-11) for Rietvlei compared to Paarl. Conclusions: There were large differences between the different South African sites in terms of vaccination coverage and timeliness, with the poorer areas of Rietvlei performing worse than the better-off areas in Paarl. The vaccination coverage was lower for the vaccines given at an older age. There is a need for continued efforts to improve vaccination coverage and timeliness, in particular in rural areas.en
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.titleVaccination coverage and timeliness in three South African areas: a prospective studyeng
dc.typePeer reviewedeng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Community medicine, Social medicine: 801eng
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2011 Fadnes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng
bora.cristinID841071eng
bibo.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-404eng
dc.identifier.cristinID841071eng
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-404


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY