Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPsaki, Stephanieen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeidman, Jessicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorGottlieb, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBhutta, Zulfiqar A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Tahmeeden_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, A. M. Shamsiren_US
dc.contributor.authorBessong, Pascalen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Sushil M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKang, Gagandeepen_US
dc.contributor.authorKosek, Margareten_US
dc.contributor.authorLima, Aldoen_US
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Prakash S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSvensen, Erlingen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheckley, Williamen_US
dc.contributor.authorMAL-ED Network Investigatorsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-22T13:40:44Z
dc.date.available2014-09-22T13:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-21eng
dc.identifier.issn1478-7954
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8520
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is no standardized approach to comparing socioeconomic status (SES) across multiple sites in epidemiological studies. This is particularly problematic when cross-country comparisons are of interest. We sought to develop a simple measure of SES that would perform well across diverse, resource-limited settings. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 800 children aged 24 to 60 months across eight resource-limited settings. Parents were asked to respond to a household SES questionnaire, and the height of each child was measured. A statistical analysis was done in two phases. First, the best approach for selecting and weighting household assets as a proxy for wealth was identified. We compared four approaches to measuring wealth: maternal education, principal components analysis, Multidimensional Poverty Index, and a novel variable selection approach based on the use of random forests. Second, the selected wealth measure was combined with other relevant variables to form a more complete measure of household SES. We used child height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) as the outcome of interest. Results: Mean age of study children was 41 months, 52% were boys, and 42% were stunted. Using cross-validation, we found that random forests yielded the lowest prediction error when selecting assets as a measure of household wealth. The final SES index included access to improved water and sanitation, eight selected assets, maternal education, and household income (the WAMI index). A 25% difference in the WAMI index was positively associated with a difference of 0.38 standard deviations in HAZ (95% CI 0.22 to 0.55). Conclusions: Statistical learning methods such as random forests provide an alternative to principal components analysis in the development of SES scores. Results from this multicountry study demonstrate the validity of a simplified SES index. With further validation, this simplified index may provide a standard approach for SES adjustment across resource-limited settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0eng
dc.subjectSocioeconomic statuseng
dc.subjectChild growtheng
dc.subjectClassification, Measurementeng
dc.titleMeasuring socioeconomic status in multicountry studies: results from the eight-country MAL-ED studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2014-04-09T15:09:12Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 Psaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderStephanie R Psaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber8
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-12-8
dc.identifier.cristin1161965
dc.source.journalPopulation Health Metrics
dc.source.4012


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY