• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and the History of Religions
  • Master theses
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and the History of Religions
  • Master theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Den gode statsmann i romersk politisk tenkning

Røeggen, Thomas Lundal
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
master thesis (1.325Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2761437
Date
2021-06-02
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master theses [104]
Abstract
In this thesis I trace the political concept of the “the good statesman” through the transitional period between the late Roman Republic and the early Roman Principate. I focus primarily on four political writers – Cicero and Sallust in the Republican period, Seneca and Tacitus during the Principate – and I aim to situate their thinking about the good statesman within the context of their general political thought, and the broader context of Roman political and social life. One of the main conclusions I arrive at in this thesis is that the very mode of discussion flips during the Principate, by assuming a negative form. Here, the discussion of the good statesman no longer aims at a positive good, like individual or collective gloria. Rather, the mode of discussion assumes a new premise, namely that the statesman ought to be guided away from something – this could be misuse of his political powers, or something specified in greater detail by the relevant author. I explain this phenomenon both by pointing to the structural changes that occurred when the emperors seized political control over Rome, as well as the very arbitrariness of the emperor’s powers. This thesis also demonstrates that several Roman authors participate in rich and nuanced philosophical traditions of discourse – both Roman and Greek. However, they also share a suspicious attitude towards the scale of values which they ascribe to Greek thinkers. In this case, the Romans clearly want to distance themselves from the Greek philosophical tradition, in which the philosophical life (or the “contemplative life”, as put forth by Aristotle) takes precedence over the political life. This can also offer an explanation as to why the discussion of the good statesman in its Roman setting – based on the selected source material I will discuss here – never loses contact with practical life. Rather, the discussion takes the form of a direct response to concrete political challenges and goals.
Publisher
The University of Bergen
Copyright
Copyright the Author. All rights reserved

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit