Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Maria Lund
dc.contributor.authorRiisgaard, Karen
dc.contributor.authorFrede, Thingstad
dc.contributor.authorSt. John, Mike
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Torkel Gissel
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-15T13:41:53Z
dc.date.available2016-01-15T13:41:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-23
dc.PublishedAquatic Microbial Ecology 2015, 76:49-69eng
dc.identifier.issn1616-1564en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/10971
dc.description.abstractIn temperate, subpolar and polar marine systems, the classical perception is that diatoms initiate the spring bloom and thereby mark the beginning of the productive season. Contrary to this view, we document an active microbial food web dominated by pico- and nanoplankton prior to the diatom bloom, a period with excess nutrients and deep convection of the water column. During repeated visits to stations in the deep Iceland and Norwegian basins and the shallow Shetland Shelf (26 March to 29 April 2012), we investigated the succession and dynamics of photosynthetic and heterotrophic microorganisms. We observed that the early phytoplankton production was followed by a decrease in the carbon:nitrogen ratio of the dissolved organic matter in the deep mixed stations, an increase in heterotrophic prokaryote (bacteria) abundance and activity (indicated by the high nucleic acid:low nucleic acid bacteria ratio), and an increase in abundance and size of heterotrophic protists. The major chl a contribution in the early winter-spring transition was found in the fraction <10 µm, i.e. dominated by pico- and small nanophytoplankton. The relative abundance of picophytoplankton decreased towards the end of the cruise at all stations despite nutrient-replete conditions and increasing day length. This decrease is hypothesised to be the result of top-down control by the fast-growing population of heterotrophic protists. As a result, the subsequent succession and nutrient depletion can be left to larger phytoplankton resistant to small grazers. Further, we observed that large phytoplankton (chl a > 50 µm) were stimulated by deep mixing later in the period, while picophytoplankton were unaffected by mixing; both physical and biological reasons for this development are discussed herein.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherInter-Research Science Center (IR)en_US
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/17362" target="blank">Microbial dynamics in high latitude ecosystems. Responses to mixing, runoff and seasonal variation a rapidly changing environment</a>en_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY 3.0eng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0eng
dc.subjectMicrobial food webeng
dc.subjectWinter−spring transitioneng
dc.subjectDeep mixingeng
dc.subjectPicophytoplanktoneng
dc.subjectNanophytoplanktoneng
dc.subjectBacteriaeng
dc.subjectHeterotrophic nanoflagellateseng
dc.subjectMicrozooplanktoneng
dc.subjectSubarctic Atlanticeng
dc.titleWinter−spring transition in the subarcticAtlantic: microbial response to deep mixingand pre-bloom productionen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-09-25T14:13:17Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2015 The Authorsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3354/ame01767
dc.identifier.cristin1275443
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY 3.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY 3.0