• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Psychology
  • Faculty of Psychology
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Psychology
  • Faculty of Psychology
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Advocating for increment in the number of women in public office in Ghana: from independence to 2008

Nkansah, Michael
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
58332263.pdf (610.9Kb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/3486
Date
2009-05-29
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Faculty of Psychology [452]
Abstract
The 1950s were a period of great hope and promise for Ghana. Ghana became the first country south of the Sahara to become independent. Though the independence struggle was led by men they were aided by women. Women played a key role in mobilizing people for the struggle at the grassroot level. After independence the efforts of women were not rewarded with appointments to public office. This was rectified in 1965 through an affirmative action. However succeeding Governments since then have not followed up the 1965 affirmative action programme which led to an increment in the number of women in public office despite rhetorics to the contrary. Many women NGOs have therefore answered the call and taken up the challenge to promote more women into public office. These advocacy groups have become important instruments in highlighting the challenges women face in trying to access public positions. Through seminars and other public fora they have called for these challenges to be addressed. In spite of these efforts the number of women in public office in Ghana remains low. It is against this background this study attempts to identify some of the key reasons that have limited the impact of these women's advocacy groups. It tries to answer the question why these groups have not succeeded in convincing succeeding governments to increase the number of women in public office. Based on data collected by using qualitative methodology, this study found that three factors: the cultural environment, the role of the media and the internal dynamics within the advocacy groups, has been contributors to the little impact made by the advocacy groups.
Publisher
The University of Bergen
Copyright
Copyright the author. All rights reserved
The author

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit