Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHvaring, Christina L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBirkeland, Karien_US
dc.contributor.authorÅstrøm, Anne Nordrehaugen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-20T08:50:37Z
dc.date.available2014-06-20T08:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-22eng
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8004
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aims of this study were to (1) investigate to what extent the generic and condition specific (CS) forms of the oral impact of daily performance (OIDP) inventory discriminate between a group of patients with hypodontia and a group of patients having malocclusion, (2) assess the association of the generic and CS OIDP with severity and localisation of hypodontia, whilst adjusting for patients’ age and sex. Methods: A total of 163 patients aged 10–17 years were included in a cross-sectional study. Two groups were investigated: 62 patients with non-syndromic hypodontia and 101 non-hypodontia patients. Both groups had a malocclusion of similar treatment need. All patients underwent a clinical and radiographic examination and completed a Norwegian version of the generic and the CS OIDP inventory. CS scores were established for impacts attributed to hypodontia. Results: The mean number of missing teeth in the hypodontia group was 6.2. The prevalence of generic and CS oral impacts in the hypodontia group were 64% and 30%, and the corresponding rates in the non-hypodontia group were 62% and 10%. The generic OIDP did not discriminate between the two groups with respect to overall scores. The CS OIDP discriminated strongly between patients with and without hypodontia regarding problems with emotional status, showing teeth, social contact, speaking and carrying out work. Compared to the non-hypodontia group, patients with hypodontia, with severe hypodontia (≥ 6 missing teeth) and upper anterior hypodontia were respectively 3.4, 2.5 and 7.0 times more likely to report any oral impact attributed to small teeth, gaps between teeth and missing teeth. Conclusions: Hypodontia and malocclusion patients report a considerable burden of oral impacts. The CS-OIDP measure discriminated most effectively between patients with and without hypodontia and was related to severity and upper anterior localisation of hypodontia.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectHypodontiaeng
dc.subjectTooth agenesiseng
dc.subjectMissing teetheng
dc.subjectMalocclusioneng
dc.subjectOral health related quality of lifeeng
dc.subjectOHRQoLeng
dc.subjectOral impact on daily performanceeng
dc.subjectOIDPeng
dc.subjectAdolescenteng
dc.subjectChildeng
dc.titleDiscriminative ability of the generic and condition specific Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) among adolescents with and without hypodontiaen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2014-05-31T03:10:56Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderChristina L Hvaring et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 Hvaring et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber57
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-57
dc.identifier.cristin1136036
dc.source.journalBMC Oral Health
dc.source.4014


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY