dc.contributor.author | Kristoffersen, Gjert | eng |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-02T14:22:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-11-02T14:22:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | eng |
dc.Published | Nordic Journal of Linguistics 2006 29: 95-135. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0332-5865 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-4717 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1956/2401 | |
dc.description.abstract | A new formal analysis of the tonal accent contrast in Urban East Norwegian (UEN), is developed in this paper, based on Optimality Theory. In opposition to the widespread assumption that the contrast is based on privativity, this paper represents a return to the position that the contrast derives from different timing of a common underlying melody. Surface privativity, i.e. the absence vs. presence of an H, that can be observed in the contrast between accent 1 and 2 in Urban East Norwegian,, is analyzed as the result of marked (accent 1) vs. unmarked (accent 2) association of a common tonal input. The marked status of accent 1 follows from lexical pre-linking, protected by high-ranking faithfulness, which overrides (unmarked) association driven by the markedness constraints alone. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Copyright 2006: Cambridge University Press Link to electronic edition of Nordic Journal of Linguistics: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=NJL | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | eng |
dc.subject | Norwegian | eng |
dc.subject | Markedness | eng |
dc.subject | Tone | eng |
dc.subject | Lexical accent | eng |
dc.title | Markedness in Urban East Norwegian tonal accent | eng |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/s0332586506001508 | |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Nordiske språk: 018 | |