Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSandin, Päreng
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-16T11:23:49Z
dc.date.available2010-04-16T11:23:49Z
dc.date.issued2002eng
dc.identifier.citationEranos (100): 146-160en
dc.identifier.issn0013-9947eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/3883
dc.description.abstractIn Sept. 915 read δόμων μὰν (Schneider) ἀχώ || ἐπ’ αὐτούς, in 926 ἆ δυσδαίμων σφιν (or σφῷν) || τεκοῦσα. In Supp. 960 read εἰ δ’ ἐκεῖ. In Supp. 1002 read χἄλωρα κωλύονθ’ ὁμῶς μέλειν ἔρῳ: “Cypris proclaims the ripe fruit as well as the reluctant pray to be a care of Love”. In Ag. 557 Schwerdt’s ἂν λάχοιμεν is worth consideration. In Cho. 155 read ἀφευέτω for ἀπεύχετον. In Eum. 490 read καταστροφαὶ δ’ ἐμῶν. The existence of objective truth and the possibility of using language as a tool for its investigation are necessary pragmatic assumptions of any scholarly activity. Karl Popper’s philosophical framework offers a defence against accusations of theoretical naïveté.en
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherEranoseng
dc.subjectAeschyluseng
dc.subjectTextual criticismeng
dc.subjectPhilosophy of scienceeng
dc.titleCritical notes on Aeschyluseng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Klassisk filologi: 032nob
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humaniora: 000::Filosofiske fag: 160::Filosofi: 161nob
dc.rights.holderCopyright Eranos. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record