• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Evaluation of Turbulence Models in Gas Dispersion

Moen, Alexander
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
144806185.pdf (3.713Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/12577
Date
2016-06-01
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Department of Physics and Technology [1327]
Abstract
Several earlier model validation studies for predicting gas dispersion scenarios have been conducted for the three RANS two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence models, the standard k-ε (SKE), Re- Normalisation group k-ε (RNG) and Realizable k-ε (Realizable). However, these studies have mainly validated one or two of the models, and have mostly used one simulation case as a basis for determining which model is the best suited for predicting such scenarios. In addition, the studies have shown conflicting results as to which model is ideal for dispersion simulations. The aim of the study was therefore to assess three well-known RANS two-equation eddy viscosity models, in four different gas dispersion cases. The purpose was to evaluate the models' behaviour compared to experimental data, in order to see which of the models was best suited for predicting dispersion scenarios. The cases used in the thesis were: CO2 dispersion in a cross- wind, neutral dispersion in an urban environment, hydrogen jet impinging on a surface, and a dense jet dispersion on an industrial site. All simulations were conducted with a CFD software that partially resolved the geometry, and was designed for large complex multiscale flow scenarios. The most important parameters for assessing the turbulence models were accuracy of the simulation results and computational time used. Overall, SKE seemed to be the best-suited model for 3 out of 4 cases, and provided good results for all the scenarios. However, RNG also provided reasonably results in all cases, in a practical timeframe. Realizable was the model that commonly used longest computational time, and was found least suitable for 3 out of 4 cases.
Publisher
The University of Bergen
Copyright
Copyright the Author. All rights reserved

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Geo-modelling of paleokarst reservoirs - from cave-survey to geocellular paleokarst model 

    Ledsaak, Karina (Master thesis, 2016-11-20)
    Hydrocarbon reservoirs exhibiting features inherited from former karst processes acting on the reservoir rocks are relatively common worldwide. However, on the Norwegian continental shelf, paleokarst plays have only recently ...
  • 3D stochastic modelling of fault zones in siliciclastic reservoirs. Implications for reservoir description and fluid flow modelling 

    Fachri, Muhammad (Doctoral thesis, 2014-12-16)
    Fault zones in siliciclastic rocks form distinct volumetric entities and typically exhibit great structural complexity. While it has been considered that the main impact of fault zones to fluid flow is to baffle or block ...
  • Seismic modeling of plaster models deformed in extension and contraction 

    Andersen, Christine Torsvik (Master thesis, 2014-11-18)
    The effects of overburden, burial depth, source-receiver distance and frequency on seismic resolution have been studied in this thesis. Synthetic seismic sections of two plaster models, where a volume of plaster has been ...

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit