dc.contributor.author | Meland, Eivind | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brodersen, John | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-20T12:37:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-20T12:37:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.Published | Meland E, Brodersen J. Why several truths can be true. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2016;34(3):282-285 | eng |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-7724 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0281-3432 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17630 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we offer a perspective on complementarity, acknowledging that it is not possible for human perception and cognition to grasp reality with unambiguous concepts or theories. Therefore, multiple concepts and perspectives are valid when they are not exaggerated beyond reasonable limits and do not claim exclusive validity. We recommend a humble stance enabling respectful dialogue between different perspectives in medical science and practice. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | eng |
dc.rights | Attribution CC BY-NC | eng |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | eng |
dc.subject | Medical ethics | eng |
dc.subject | research ethics | eng |
dc.subject | philosophy of science | eng |
dc.title | Why several truths can be true | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.date.updated | 2018-02-01T11:55:43Z | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2016 The Author(s) | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207146 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1411021 | |
dc.source.journal | Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care | |