Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaugstvedt, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernar, Ingvilden_US
dc.contributor.authorStrandberg, Ragnhild Bjarkøyen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichards, David Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Roy Miodinien_US
dc.contributor.authorTell, Grethe S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGraue, Mariten_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T08:01:28Z
dc.date.available2019-05-29T08:01:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedHaugstvedt A, Hernar I, Strandberg RØ, Richards DA, Nilsen RM, Tell GST, Graue M. Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical diabetes consultations: study protocol for the DiaPROM randomised controlled trial pilot study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024008eng
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/19792
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Although diabetes distress is found to be associated with decreased glycaemic control among adults with type 1 diabetes, the psychological and emotional impact of living with the condition is often not recognised and often under-reported in diabetes care. Therefore, regular assessment of diabetes distress is recommended. Assessment of diabetes distress using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice has the potential to enhance care for people with diabetes by identifying problems and improving patient–clinician communication. In this study protocol, we describe a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aiming to test the feasibility of all components of an empowerment-based intervention using PROMs as dialogue support in clinical diabetes consultations, and to address the uncertainties associated with running a fully powered evaluation study. Methods: and analysis We will undertake a two-arm pilot RCT of an intervention using the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale in clinical diabetes consultations in order to conclude whether a fully powered trial is appropriate and/or feasible. The study will also include qualitative indepth interviews with participants and healthcare providers. Our objectives are to (1) evaluate the recruitment procedures and attrition rates; (2) evaluate the performance of the randomisation procedure; (3) evaluate the participants’ mean scores on the outcome measures before and after the intervention; (4) evaluate if the intervention consultations are acceptable and feasible; and (5) explore patients’ and healthcare providers’ experiences with the use of PAID as dialogue support and empowerment-based communication skills in clinical diabetes consultations. The quantitative data analysis includes descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, SD and CI). For the qualitative data, we will perform thematic analysis. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Western Norway Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2017/1506/REC west). We will present the findings from the study phases at national and international conferences and submit manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals and popular science journals.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBMJeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/eng
dc.titleUse of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical diabetes consultations: study protocol for the DiaPROM randomised controlled trial pilot studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-01-22T08:15:35Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024008
dc.identifier.cristin1660470
dc.source.journalBMJ Open
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2019, 9, e024008.


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY-NC
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY-NC