Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDullie, Luckson Wandanien_US
dc.contributor.authorMeland, Eivinden_US
dc.contributor.authorHetlevik, Øysteinen_US
dc.contributor.authorMildestvedt, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorKasenda, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKantema, Constanceen_US
dc.contributor.authorGjesdal, Sturlaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-12T12:41:08Z
dc.date.available2020-06-12T12:41:08Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-18
dc.PublishedDullie LW, Meland E, Hetlevik Ø, Mildestvedt T, Kasenda, Kantema, Gjesdal S. Performance of primary care in different healthcare facilities: A cross-sectional study of patients' experiences in Southern Malawi. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029579eng
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/22566
dc.description.abstractObjective In most African countries, primary care is delivered through a district health system. Many factors, including staffing levels, staff experience, availability of equipment and facility management, affect the quality of primary care between and within countries. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of primary care in different types of public health facilities in Southern Malawi. Study design This was a cross-sectional quantitative study. Setting The study was conducted in 12 public primary care facilities in Neno, Blantyre and Thyolo districts in July 2018. Participants Patients aged ≥18 years, excluding the severely ill, were selected to participate in the study. Primary outcomes We used the Malawian primary care assessment tool to conduct face-to-face interviews. Analysis of variance at 0.05 significance level was performed to compare primary care dimension means and total primary care scores. Linear regression models at 95% CI were used to assess associations between primary care dimension scores, patients’ characteristics and healthcare setting. Results The final number of respondents was 962 representing 96.1% response rate. Patients in Neno hospitals scored 3.77 points higher than those in Thyolo health centres, and 2.87 higher than those in Blantyre health centres in total primary care performance. Primary care performance in health centres and in hospital clinics was similar in Neno (20.9 vs 19.0, p=0.608) while in Thyolo, it was higher at the hospital than at the health centres (19.9 vs 15.2, p<0.001). Urban and rural facilities showed a similar pattern of performance. Conclusion These results showed considerable variation in experiences among primary care users in the public health facilities in Malawi. Factors such as funding, policy and clinic-level interventions influence patients’ reports of primary care performance. These factors should be further examined in longitudinal and experimental settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBMJeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/eng
dc.titlePerformance of primary care in different healthcare facilities: A cross-sectional study of patients' experiences in Southern Malawien_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-01-31T09:48:43Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s))
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029579
dc.identifier.cristin1739004
dc.source.journalBMJ Open


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC