• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • Department of Physics and Technology
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Performance Evaluation of a Small-Animal PET/CT System

Dahle, Tordis Johnsen
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
121803609.pdf (21.61Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/8546
Date
2014-06-02
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Department of Physics and Technology [1822]
Abstract
This master project is the first vendor-independent performance evaluation of the new nanoScan PET/CT system at the University of Bergen. A comprehensive performance evaluation of a novel scanner is very important, particularly when quantitative assessments of images are required. The nanoScan PET/CT system is a fully integrated small-animal PET/CT system. An abbreviated performance evaluation of the CT subsystem was done, which included a Hounsfield quality check, a comparison of reconstruction filters and an evaluation of the different scanning methods. The PET subsystem was performance evaluated according to the NEMA NU 4-2008 standard. This standard includes tests of spatial resolution, counting rate capabilities, sensitivity and image quality. The CT evaluation proved adequate for its intended use. There were only minor differences in the noise measurement of the different reconstruction filters. The scanning method helical, 1 pitch" would for most applications be recommended, as this scanning method had lowest dose, good images, and just few minutes longer scan time than the scanning method with lowest scan time. The measurements from the PET evaluation were in good agreement with values reported by vendor and in literature. The evaluation of the scanner shows that it has one of the best spatial resolutions available, approximately 1 mm at center of field of view (FOV). The sensitivity at center of FOV was 8.8%, just a bit lower than the highest reported absolute sensitivity at center of FOV, i.e. 10%. The counting rate capabilities proved adequate for all applications undertaken to date, and the NEMA image quality phantom studies demonstrated good values of uniformity and recovery coefficients. The procedures and methods in this thesis will make it easier to monitor the scanner performance with periodic testing to check if the scanner is robust, reliable and reproducible.
Publisher
The University of Bergen
Copyright
Copyright the author. All rights reserved

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit