Exploring Subexponential Parameterized Complexity of Completion Problems

Abstract

Let F be a family of graphs. In the F-Completion problem, we are given an n-vertex graph G and an integer k as input, and asked whether at most k edges can be added to G so that the resulting graph does not contain a graph from F as an induced subgraph. It appeared recently that special cases of F-Completion, the problem of completing into a chordal graph known as Minimum Fill-in, corresponding to the case of F = {C4,C5,C6, . . .}, and the problem of completing into a split graph, i.e., the case of F = {C4, 2K2,C5}, are solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(√ k log k)nO(1). The exploration of this phenomenon is the main motivation for our research on F-Completion. In this paper we prove that completions into several well studied classes of graphs without long induced cycles also admit parameterized subexponential time algorithms by showing that: The problem Trivially Perfect Completion is solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(√k log k)nO(1), that is F-Completion for F = {C4, P4}, a cycle and a path on four vertices. The problems known in the literature as Pseudosplit Completion, the case where F = {2K2,C4}, and Threshold Completion, where F = {2K2, P4,C4}, are also solvable in time 2O(√k log k)nO(1). We complement our algorithms for F-Completion with the following lower bounds: For F = {2K2}, F = {C4}, F = {P4}, and F = {2K2, P4}, F-Completion cannot be solved in time 2o(k)nO(1) unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our upper and lower bounds provide a complete picture of the subexponential parameterized complexity of F-Completion problems for F ⊆ {2K2,C4, P4}.