Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Åpne
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/12136Utgivelsesdato
2016-05-11Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Originalversjon
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4Sammendrag
Priority setting is inevitable on the path towards universal health coverage. All countries experience a gap between their population’s health needs and what is economically feasible for governments to provide. Can priority setting ever be fair and ethically acceptable? Fairness requires that unmet health needs be addressed, but in a fair order. Three criteria for priority setting are widely accepted among ethicists: cost-effectiveness, priority to the worse-off, and financial risk protection. Thus, a fair health system will expand coverage for cost-effective services and give extra priority to those benefiting the worse-off, whilst at the same time providing high financial risk protection. It is considered unacceptable to treat people differently according to their gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, social status, or place of residence. Inequalities in health outcomes associated with such personal characteristics are therefore unfair and should be minimized. This commentary also discusses a third group of contested criteria, including rare diseases, small health benefits, age, and personal responsibility for health, subsequently rejecting them. In conclusion, countries need to agree on criteria and establish transparent and fair priority setting processes.
Utgiver
BioMed CentralTidsskrift
BMC MedicineOpphavsrett
Copyright Norheim 2016Beslektede innførsler
Viser innførsler beslektet ved tittel, forfatter og emneord.
-
Attributes and consequences of health information systems data for antenatal care : Health status, health system performance and policy
Venkateswaran, Mahima (Doctoral thesis, 2019-11-05)Background: A routine health information system (RHIS) serves as an important source of data for monitoring health of clients and health system performance. All countries use RHIS data for some form of priority setting; ... -
A Critical Perspective on Mental Health News in Six European Countries: How Are “Mental Health/Illness” and “Mental Health Literacy” Rhetorically Constructed?
Van Beveren, Laura; Rutten, Kris; Hensing, Gunnel; Spyridoula, Ntani; Schønning, Viktor; Axelsson, Malin; Bockting, Claudi; Buysse, Ann; de Neve, Ine; Desmet, Mattias; Dewaele, Alexis; Giovazolias, Theodoros; Hannon, Dewi; Kafetsios, Konstantinos; Meganck, Reitske; Øverland, Simon Nygaard; Triliva, Sofia; Vandamme, Joke (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2020)In this study, we aim to contribute to the field of critical health communication research by examining how notions of mental health and illness are discursively constructed in newspapers and magazines in six European ... -
Health managers’ views on the status of national and decentralized health systems for child and adolescent mental health in Uganda: a qualitative study
Akol, Angela; Engebretsen, Ingunn Marie S.; Skylstad, Vilde; Nalugya, Joyce; Ndeezi, Grace; Tumwine, James K. (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2015-12-08)Background: Robust health systems are required for the promotion of child and adolescent mental health (CAMH). In low and middle income countries such as Uganda neuropsychiatric illness in childhood and adolescence represent ...