Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBjørnestad, Jone Ravndal
dc.contributor.authorMoltu, Christian
dc.contributor.authorVeseth, Marius
dc.contributor.authorTjora, Tore
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T11:07:40Z
dc.date.available2021-02-18T11:07:40Z
dc.date.created2020-07-05T22:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedJournal of Medical Internet Research. 2020, 20 (4), .
dc.identifier.issn1438-8871
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2728904
dc.description.abstractBackground: Social media is an integral part of human social life. More than 90% of young people use social media daily. Current theories, models, and measures are primarily based on face-to-face conceptions, leaving research out of sync with current social trends. This may lead to imprecise diagnoses and predictions. Objective: To develop a theoretically based empirical model of current social interfaces to inform relevant measures. Methods: A three-stage, qualitative, data-collection approach included anonymous individual Post-it notes, three full-class discussions, and 10 focus groups to explore 82 adolescents’ relational practices. Data analysis followed a meaning-condensation procedure and a field-correspondence technique. Results: We developed an empirical model that categorizes adolescents’ social interactions into five experiential positions. Four positions result from trajectories relating to social media and face-to-face social interaction. Positions are described by match or mismatch dynamics between preferred and actual social platforms used. In matched positions, individuals prefer and use both face-to-face and social media platforms (position 1), prefer and use face-to-face platforms (position 2), or prefer and use social media platforms (position 3). In mismatched positions, individuals prefer face-to-face interactions but use social media platforms (position 4) or prefer social media but use face-to-face platforms (position 5). We propose that matched positions indicate good social functioning while mismatched positions indicate serious social challenges. Conclusions: We propose a model that will expand previous unidimensional social interaction constructs, and we hypothesize that the described match and mismatch analyses provide conceptual clarity for research and practical application. We discuss prediction value, implications, and model validation procedures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJMIR Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRethinking Social Interaction: Empirical Model Developmenten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright Jone Bjornestad, Christian Moltu, Marius Veseth, Tore Tjora.en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere18558en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/18558
dc.identifier.cristin1818623
dc.source.journalJournal of Medical Internet Researchen_US
dc.source.4020
dc.source.144
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Internet Research. 2020, 22 (4), e18558.en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal