Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDankel, Dorothy Jane
dc.contributor.authorTiller, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorKoelma, Elske
dc.contributor.authorLam, Vicky W.Y.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yajie
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T12:42:33Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T12:42:33Z
dc.date.created2020-11-30T18:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedFrontiers in Marine Science. 2020, 7:537 1-17.
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2730113
dc.description.abstractClimate change in the Arctic is occurring at a rapid rate. In Longyearbyen, Svalbard, the world’s northernmost city, deadly avalanches and permafrost thaw-induced architectural destruction has disrupted local governance norms and responsibilities. In the North Atlantic, the warming ocean temperatures have contributed to a rapid expansion of the mackerel stock which has spurred both geo-political tensions but also tensions at the science-policy interface of fish quota setting. These local climate-induced changes have created a domino-like chain reaction that intensifies through time as a warming Arctic penetrates deeper into responsibilities of governing institutions and science institutions. In face with the increasing uncertain futures of climate-induced changes, policy choices also increase revealing a type of “snowballing” of possible futures facing decision-makers. We introduce a portmanteau-inspired concept called “The Melting Snowball Effect” that encompasses the chain reaction (“domino effect”) that increases the number of plausible scenarios (“snowball effect”) with climate change (melting snow, ice and thawing permafrost). We demonstrate the use of “The Melting Snowball Effect” as a heuristic within a Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) framework of anticipation, engagement and reflection. To do this, we developed plausible scenarios based on participatory stakeholder workshops and narratives from in-depth interviews for deliberative discussions among academics, citizens and policymakers, designed for informed decision-making in response to climate change complexities. We observe generational differences in discussing future climate scenarios, particularly that the mixed group where three generations were represented had the most diverse and thorough deliberations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe Melting Snowball Effect: A Heuristic for Sustainable Arctic Governance Under Climate Changeen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 Dankel, Tiller, Koelma, Lam and Liu.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber537en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmars.2020.00537
dc.identifier.cristin1854442
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Marine Scienceen_US
dc.source.407:537
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Marine Science. 2020, 7, 537.en_US
dc.source.volume7en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal