dc.contributor.author | Kvarven, Amanda | |
dc.contributor.author | Strømland, Eirik André | |
dc.contributor.author | Wollbrant, Conny | |
dc.contributor.author | Andersson, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Johannesson, Magnus | |
dc.contributor.author | Tinghög, Gustav | |
dc.contributor.author | Västfjäll, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Myrseth, Kristian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-03T10:54:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-03T10:54:44Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-01-31T21:26:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2199-6776 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2753215 | |
dc.description.abstract | The hypothesis that intuition promotes cooperation has attracted considerable attention. Although key results in this literature have failed to replicate in pre-registered studies, recent meta-analyses report an overall effect of intuition on cooperation. We address the question with a meta-analysis of 82 cooperation experiments, spanning four different types of intuition manipulations—time pressure, cognitive load, depletion, and induction—including 29,315 participants in total. We obtain a positive overall effect of intuition on cooperation, though substantially weaker than that reported in prior meta-analyses, and between studies the effect exhibits a high degree of systematic variation. We find that this overall effect depends exclusively on the inclusion of six experiments featuring emotion-induction manipulations, which prompt participants to rely on emotion over reason when making allocation decisions. Upon excluding from the total data set experiments featuring this class of manipulations, between-study variation in the meta-analysis is reduced substantially—and we observed no statistically discernable effect of intuition on cooperation. Overall, we fail to obtain compelling evidence for the intuitive cooperation hypothesis. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright The Author(s) 2020 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 0 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-020-00084-3 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1884360 | |
dc.source.journal | Journal of the Economic Science Association (JESA) | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 26-42 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the Economic Science Association. 2020, 6, 26-42. | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 6 | en_US |