Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolmström, Paul
dc.contributor.authorHallberg, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorBjörk-Eriksson, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLindberg, Jesper
dc.contributor.authorOlsson, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorBååthe, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorDavidsen, Pål
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T08:34:46Z
dc.date.available2021-07-28T08:34:46Z
dc.date.created2020-09-14T12:33:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-20
dc.identifier.issn1092-7026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2765490
dc.description.abstractHealth care is a complex system with multiprofessional staff and multiple patient care pathways. Time pressure and minimal margins for error make it challenging to implement new policies or procedures, no matter how desirable. Changes in health care also requires the participation of the staff. System dynamics (SD) simulations can lead to shared systems understanding and allows for the development and testing of new scenarios in silico before implementing solutions. However, research shows that the actual implementation rate of simulations is low. This paper presents a reanalysis of a successful change project in health care combining SD principles with basic action research (AR) premises. The analysis was done by a multidisciplinary research group using qualitative methodology and identifies that a fruitful combination of AR inquiry and SD modelling potentially can improve implementation rates.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleInsights gained from a systematic reanalysis of a successful model-facilitated change process in health careen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sres.2724
dc.identifier.cristin1829682
dc.source.journalSystems research and behavioral scienceen_US
dc.source.pagenumber204-214en_US
dc.identifier.citationSystems research and behavioral science. 2020, 38 (2), 204-214en_US
dc.source.volume38en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal