Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaugg, Amelie
dc.contributor.authorSladky, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorSkouras, Stavros
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Amalia
dc.contributor.authorCraddock, Cameron
dc.contributor.authorKirschner, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorHerdener, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorKoush, Yury
dc.contributor.authorPapoutsi, Marina
dc.contributor.authorKeynan, Jackob N.
dc.contributor.authorHendler, Talma
dc.contributor.authorCohen Kadosh, Kathrin
dc.contributor.authorZich, Catharina
dc.contributor.authorMacInnes, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorAdcock, R. Alison
dc.contributor.authorDickerson, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorChen, Nan-Kuei
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Kymberly
dc.contributor.authorBodurka, Jerzy
dc.contributor.authorYao, Shuxia
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorAuer, Tibor
dc.contributor.authorSchweizer, Renate
dc.contributor.authorPamplona, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorEmmert, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorHaller, Sven
dc.contributor.authorVan De Ville, Dimitri
dc.contributor.authorBlefari, Maria-Laura
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong-Youl
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Hwan
dc.contributor.authorMarins, Theo
dc.contributor.authorFukuda, Megumi
dc.contributor.authorSorger, Bettina
dc.contributor.authorKamp, Tabea
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Sook-Lei
dc.contributor.authorVeit, Ralf
dc.contributor.authorSpetter, Maartje
dc.contributor.authorWeiskopf, Nikolaus
dc.contributor.authorScharnowski, Frank
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T10:24:57Z
dc.date.available2021-08-03T10:24:57Z
dc.date.created2021-02-21T13:45:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1065-9471
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2765994
dc.description.abstractNeurofeedback training has been shown to influence behavior in healthy participants as well as to alleviate clinical symptoms in neurological, psychosomatic, and psychiatric patient populations. However, many real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies report large inter-individual differences in learning success. The factors that cause this vast variability between participants remain unknown and their identification could enhance treatment success. Thus, here we employed a meta-analytic approach including data from 24 different neurofeedback studies with a total of 401 participants, including 140 patients, to determine whether levels of activity in target brain regions during pretraining functional localizer or no-feedback runs (i.e., self-regulation in the absence of neurofeedback) could predict neurofeedback learning success. We observed a slightly positive correlation between pretraining activity levels during a functional localizer run and neurofeedback learning success, but we were not able to identify common brain-based success predictors across our diverse cohort of studies. Therefore, advances need to be made in finding robust models and measures of general neurofeedback learning, and in increasing the current study database to allow for investigating further factors that might influence neurofeedback learning.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCan we predict real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pretraining brain activity?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hbm.25089
dc.identifier.cristin1892099
dc.source.journalHuman Brain Mappingen_US
dc.source.pagenumber3839-3854en_US
dc.identifier.citationHuman Brain Mapping. 2020, 41 (14), 3839-3854.en_US
dc.source.volume41en_US
dc.source.issue14en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal