Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMurillo, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorKenchington, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorKoen-Alonso, Mariano
dc.contributor.authorGuijarro, J.
dc.contributor.authorKenchington, T.J.
dc.contributor.authorSacau, M.
dc.contributor.authorBeazley, Lindsay
dc.contributor.authorRapp, Hans Tore
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T07:59:57Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T07:59:57Z
dc.date.created2021-01-18T12:14:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1470-160X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766352
dc.description.abstractThe ecological diversity of benthic invertebrates from bottom trawl surveys was mapped for the Flemish Cap, a plateau of ~200 km radius in the northwest Atlantic. Species density (SpD), the exponential Shannon diversity index (eH′) and Heip’s index of evenness ( E ~') were measured at different spatial scales. Continuous surfaces of each were created to 2000 m depth using predictive distribution models based on random forest (RF) algorithms. When fishing effort was included as an independent variable in the RF models, it was the most important predictor of sample SpD but unimportant in predicting eH′ and only a minor predictor of E ~'. In the absence of a historical baseline, we used a novel approach to evaluate spatial impacts of fishing on diversity by simulating and comparing spatial SpD prediction surfaces using response data associated with different levels of fishing effort. Although it is not possible to fully evaluate the precise nature of the impact of fishing on the ecological diversity, our models have identified Sackville Spur, Flemish Pass and south of Flemish Cap as the areas of greatest impact. Combining minimum bottom salinity, annual primary production range, fishing effort and biomass of sponges and small gorgonian corals, resulted in the best performing generalized additive model, explaining 73% of the total variance in SpD. Although current closures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from the adverse impacts of bottom fishing activities protect an important part of the ecological diversity associated with the deeper communities, unique and representative habitats on top of the Cap remain unprotected.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMapping benthic ecological diversity and interactions with bottom-contact fishing on the Flemish Cap (northwest Atlantic)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber106135en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106135
dc.identifier.cristin1873126
dc.source.journalEcological Indicatorsen_US
dc.identifier.citationEcological Indicators. 2020, 112, 106135.en_US
dc.source.volume112en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal