Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHorn, Sindre August
dc.contributor.authorBarra, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorNorheim, Ole Frithjof
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Carl Tollef
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T07:27:47Z
dc.date.available2022-01-27T07:27:47Z
dc.date.created2021-11-10T14:31:09Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1890-3991
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2875108
dc.description.abstractIn Norway, priority for health interventions is assigned on the basis of three official criteria: health benefit, resources, and severity. Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have mainly happened through intersectoral public health efforts such as lockdowns, quarantines, information campaigns, social distancing and, more recently, vaccine distribution. The aim of this article is to evaluate potential priority setting criteria for public health interventions. We argue in favour of the following three criteria for public health priority setting: benefit, resources and improving the well-being of the worse off. We argue that benefits and priority to the worse off may reasonably be understood in terms of individual well-being, rather than only health, for public health priority setting. We argue that lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic support our conclusions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNTNU Open Access Journalsen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/4097
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePublic health priority setting: A case for priority to the worse off in well-being during the COVID-19 pandemicen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 Sindre A. Horn, Mathias Barra, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Carl Tollef Solbergen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.5324/eip.v15i2.4097
dc.identifier.cristin1953270
dc.source.journalEtikk i praksisen_US
dc.source.pagenumber5-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationEtikk i praksis. 2021, 15 (2), 5-15.en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal