Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKoivisto, Juha
dc.contributor.authorvan Eijnatten, Maureen
dc.contributor.authorLudlow, John
dc.contributor.authorKiljunen, Timo
dc.contributor.authorShi, Xie-Qi
dc.contributor.authorWolff, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T08:52:03Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T08:52:03Z
dc.date.created2021-08-13T16:15:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1526-9914
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2989152
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to estimate and to compare effective doses in the elbow region resulting from four different x-ray imaging modalities. Absorbed organ doses were measured using 11 metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters that were placed in a custom-made anthropomorphic elbow RANDO phantom. Examinations were performed using Shimadzu FH-21 HR radiography device, Siemens Sensation Open 24-slice MSCT-device, NewTom 5G CBCT device, and Planmed Verity CBCT device, and the effective doses were calculated according to ICRP 103 recommendations. The effective dose for the conventional radiographic device was 1.5 µSv. The effective dose for the NewTom 5G CBCT ranged between 2.0 and 6.7 µSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT device 2.6 µSv and for the Siemens Sensation MSCT device 37.4 µSv. Compared with conventional 2D radiography, this study demonstrated a 1.4–4.6 fold increase in effective dose for CBCT and 25-fold dose for standard MSCT protocols. When compared with 3D CBCT protocols, the study showed a 6-19 fold increase in effective dose using a standard MSCT protocol. CBCT devices offer a feasible low-dose alternative for elbow 3D imaging when compared to MSCT.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow regionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acm2.13245
dc.identifier.cristin1925926
dc.source.journalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physicsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber128-138en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2021, 22 (5), 128-138.en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.issue5en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal