Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDefago, María Angélica Peñas
dc.contributor.authorCánaves, Violeta
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T09:30:15Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T09:30:15Z
dc.date.created2022-01-24T22:08:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1808-2432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2992455
dc.description.abstractThe case of El Salvador provides unique evidence of how solidarity is possible among different social movements in struggles over abortion law reform and its impact, even in contexts of extreme criminalization. The paper depicts a concrete example of how networks centered on abortion struggles can go beyond feminist movements and national borders, and shows the domestic impact of broadening the scope of the audience, the actors involved, and the spheres where abortion law discussions take place. The article focuses on the evolution of socio-legal mobilization regarding abortion in El Salvador over the last two decades. This evolution is presented through three moments: the first centers on the legal actions that feminist movements orchestrated in the mid-2000's around the Beatriz case. The second moment focuses on the most outstanding features of the “Las 17” campaign – a collaborative and international experience that entailed the submission of seventeen pardon petitions on behalf of women who had been convicted of homicide after having miscarriages. Finally, a third moment entails the socio-legal strategies embraced by feminist movements since 2018 within the framework of the campaign named “Las 17+”.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFundação Getúlio Vargas Escola de Direitoen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSocio-Legal Strategies against a Total Abortion Ban in El Salvador: Alliances in Hostile Contextsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere2147en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/2317-6172202147
dc.identifier.cristin1989032
dc.source.journalDireito GV Law Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.citationDireito GV Law Review. 2021, 17 (3), e2147.en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal