Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCheung, Ho-Nam
dc.contributor.authorKeenlyside, Noel Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorKoenigk, Torben
dc.contributor.authorYang, Shuting
dc.contributor.authorTian, Tian
dc.contributor.authorXu, Zhiqing
dc.contributor.authorGao, Yongqi
dc.contributor.authorOgawa, Fumiaki
dc.contributor.authorOmrani, Nour-Eddine
dc.contributor.authorQiao, Shaobo
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Wen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T11:47:18Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T11:47:18Z
dc.date.created2022-01-26T00:50:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0930-7575
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2997903
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the uncertainty (i.e., inter-model spread) in future projections of the boreal winter climate, based on the forced response of ten models from the CMIP5 following the RCP8.5 scenario. The uncertainty in the forced response of sea level pressure (SLP) is large in the North Pacific, the North Atlantic, and the Arctic. A major part of these uncertainties (31%) is marked by a pattern with a center in the northeastern Pacific and a dipole over the northeastern Atlantic that we label as the Pacific–Atlantic SLP uncertainty pattern (PA∆SLP). The PA∆SLP is associated with distinct global sea surface temperature (SST) and Arctic sea ice cover (SIC) perturbation patterns. To better understand the nature of the PA∆SLP, these SST and SIC perturbation patterns are prescribed in experiments with two atmospheric models (AGCMs): CAM4 and IFS. The AGCM responses suggest that the SST uncertainty contributes to the North Pacific SLP uncertainty in CMIP5 models, through tropical–midlatitude interactions and a forced Rossby wavetrain. The North Atlantic SLP uncertainty in CMIP5 models is better explained by the combined effect of SST and SIC uncertainties, partly related to a Rossby wavetrain from the Pacific and air-sea interaction over the North Atlantic. Major discrepancies between the CMIP5 and AGCM forced responses over northern high-latitudes and continental regions are indicative of uncertainties arising from the AGCMs. We analyze the possible dynamic mechanisms of these responses, and discuss the limitations of this work.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAssessing the influence of sea surface temperature and arctic sea ice cover on the uncertainty in the boreal winter future climate projectionsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00382-022-06136-0
dc.identifier.cristin1990009
dc.source.journalClimate Dynamicsen_US
dc.relation.projectNordforsk: 90077en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 316618en_US
dc.relation.projectNordforsk: 76654en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 312017en_US
dc.relation.projectTrond Mohn stiftelse: BFS2018TMT01en_US
dc.relation.projectNotur/NorStore: NS9015Ken_US
dc.relation.projectNotur/NorStore: NS9064Ken_US
dc.relation.projectNotur/NorStore: NN9390Ken_US
dc.relation.projectNotur/NorStore: NN2343Ken_US
dc.identifier.citationClimate Dynamics. 2022.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal