Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPryor, Sara C.
dc.contributor.authorBarthelmie, Rebecca Jane
dc.contributor.authorCadence, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorDellwik, Ebba
dc.contributor.authorHasager, Charlotte Bay
dc.contributor.authorKral, Stephan Thomas
dc.contributor.authorReuder, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorVeraart, Marijn
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T09:10:05Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T09:10:05Z
dc.date.created2022-11-24T10:28:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3037151
dc.description.abstractLeading edge erosion (LEE) of wind turbine blades causes decreased aerodynamic performance leading to lower power production and revenue and increased operations and maintenance costs. LEE is caused primarily by materials stresses when hydrometeors (rain and hail) impact on rotating blades. The kinetic energy transferred by these impacts is a function of the precipitation intensity, droplet size distributions (DSD), hydrometeor phase and the wind turbine rotational speed which in turn depends on the wind speed at hub-height. Hence, there is a need to better understand the hydrometeor properties and the joint probability distributions of precipitation and wind speeds at prospective and operating wind farms in order to quantify the potential for LEE and the financial efficacy of LEE mitigation measures. However, there are relatively few observational datasets of hydrometeor DSD available for such locations. Here, we analyze six observational datasets from spatially dispersed locations and compare them with existing literature and assumed DSD used in laboratory experiments of material fatigue. We show that the so-called Best DSD being recommended for use in whirling arm experiments does not represent the observational data. Neither does the Marshall Palmer approximation. We also use these data to derive and compare joint probability distributions of drivers of LEE; precipitation intensity (and phase) and wind speed. We further review and summarize observational metrologies for hydrometeor DSD, provide information regarding measurement uncertainty in the parameters of critical importance to kinetic energy transfer and closure of data sets from different instruments. A series of recommendations are made about research needed to evolve towards the required fidelity for a priori estimates of LEE potential.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAtmospheric Drivers of Wind Turbine Blade Leading Edge Erosion: Review and Recommendations for Future Researchen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber8553en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en15228553
dc.identifier.cristin2079810
dc.source.journalEnergiesen_US
dc.identifier.citationEnergies. 2022, 15 (22), 8553.en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.issue22en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal