dc.contributor.author | Christensen, Tom | |
dc.contributor.author | Lægreid, Per | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-08T13:18:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-08T13:18:00Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-05-13T17:11:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1566-7170 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3049327 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article focuses on the role of experts in the Norwegian decision-making process in central government during the crisis management of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is based on a structural-instrumental and a cultural perspective. The main findings are that managing the pandemic led to a centralization of power in the hands of the political leadership, a blurring of the dichotomy between politics and administration, and a variety of expert advice. The crisis management also reflected the cultural appropriateness of a collaborative decision-making style, but it was not characterized by a scientization of policymaking. Rather than policymaking by experts it was policymaking informed by experts. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Scientization under pressure—The problematic role of expert bodies during the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11115-022-00605-0 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2024516 | |
dc.source.journal | Public Organization Review | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 291-307 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Public Organization Review. 2022, 22, 291-307. | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 22 | en_US |