Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFischer, Johannes Maria
dc.contributor.authorHalbig, Josefine Mareile
dc.contributor.authorAugdal, Thomas Angell
dc.contributor.authorAngenete, Oskar W
dc.contributor.authorStoustrup, Peter
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, Kasper Dahl
dc.contributor.authorSkeie, Marit Slåttelid
dc.contributor.authorTylleskär, Karin
dc.contributor.authorRosén, Annika
dc.contributor.authorShi, Xie-Qi
dc.contributor.authorRosendahl, Karen
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T13:56:11Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T13:56:11Z
dc.date.created2022-05-31T18:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3049798
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To examine the precision of imaging measures commonly used to assess mandibular morphology in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Secondly, to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the measurement of condylar height. Methods: Those included were children diagnosed with JIA during 2015–18 who had had an MRI, a CBCT of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) and a lateral cephalogram (ceph) of the head within one month of each other. Agreement within and between observers and methods was examined using Bland-Altman mean-difference plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). A 95% LOA within 15% of the sample mean was considered acceptable. Minimal detectable change (MDC) within and between observers was estimated. Results: 90 patients (33 males) were included, with a mean age of 12.8 years. For MRI, intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were relatively narrow for total mandibular length: 9.6% of the sample mean. For CBCT, condylar height, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were wide: 16.0 and 28.4% of the sample mean, respectively. For ceph, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were narrow for the SNA-angle and gonion angle: 5.9 and 8% of the sample mean, and 6.2 and 6.8%, respectively. Conclusions: We have identified a set of precise measurements for facial morphology assessments in JIA, including one MRI-based (total mandibular length), one CBCT-based (condylar height), and three ceph-based. Condylar height was higher for MRI than for CBCT; however, the measurement was too imprecise for clinical use. MDC was also determined for a series of measurements.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBIRen_US
dc.titleObserver agreement of imaging measurements used for evaluation of dentofacial deformity in juvenile idiopathic arthritisen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber20210478en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20210478
dc.identifier.cristin2028590
dc.source.journalDentomaxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citationDentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2022, 51 (6), 20210478en_US
dc.source.volume51en_US
dc.source.issue6en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel