Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPena, Rosa Aurora Rodriguez
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Andrea D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-18T10:17:54Z
dc.date.available2024-01-18T10:17:54Z
dc.date.created2023-06-14T12:45:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2007-4298
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3112427
dc.description.abstractBackground: Geographic distance promotes phenotypic variation by facilitating environmental distance, limiting gene flow, and exposing plants to different pollen vectors. Therefore, understanding how plant morphology changes across a geographic range improves our understanding of the drivers of morphological diversification both on a macro- and micro-evolutionary scale. Questions: 1) How do geographic location and abiotic factors affect flower morphology between populations? 2) Is there a geographic pattern of flower morphology variation? and 3) How does yearly variation in temperature and precipitation affect flower morphology within populations? Studied species: Penstemon albidus, P. fruticosus, P. glandulosus, P. speciosus, and P. whippleanus Study site and dates: The continental USA, summers of 2017 and 2018 Methods: Fifty-seven populations and 496 individuals were selected at random to measure ten floral traits. Bioclimatic variables were extracted from the WorldClim database and NOAA. Linear models, partial least squares regression, Mantel tests and canonical correlation analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: Geographic variables alone explained a significant portion of the variation in flower morphology in two species, while in others, flower morphology did not vary despite large geographic distances. Penstemon albidus and P. whippleanus flowers increase in size from south-north, while P. glandulosus and P. speciosus exhibited an east-west increasing trend. Additionally, mean annual precipitation was the most important variable influencing P. glandulosusflower morphology. Conclusions: Geographic distance facilitates isolation-by-distance and isolation-by-phenology as well as abiotic differences between populations; however, other factors such as pollinators might be keeping populations morphologically homogeneous despite large geographic distance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleFlower morphology variation in five species of Penstemon (Plantaginaceae) displaying Hymenoptera pollination syndromeen_US
dc.title.alternativeVariación de la morfología floral en cinco especies de Penstemon (Plantaginaceae) que muestran el síndrome de polinización de himenópterosen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.17129/botsci.3084
dc.identifier.cristin2154434
dc.source.journalBoletín de la Sociedad Botánica de Méxicoen_US
dc.source.pagenumber217-232en_US
dc.identifier.citationBoletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 2023, 101 (1), 217-232.en_US
dc.source.volume101en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal