dc.contributor.author | Hvide, Hans K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Meling, Tom G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-22T11:11:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-22T11:11:34Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-06-27T13:57:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0893-9454 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3147574 | |
dc.description.abstract | Using procurement auctions and register data, we find that temporary demand shocks have long-term effects for startups. Startups that win a procurement auction have 20 higher sales and employment and are more profitable than startups that narrowly lose an auction, even several years after the contract work has ended. There are no such effects for mature firms. The effects for startups are large: about 50 of the contract value is transmitted into long-term sales. Our analysis suggests learning-by-doing as a plausible mechanism. Overall, our results point to the importance of path dependence in shaping the long-term outcomes of startups. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Do Temporary Demand Shocks Have Long-Term Effects for Startups? | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 2 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/rfs/hhac028 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2158705 | |
dc.source.journal | The Review of financial studies | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 317-350 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The Review of financial studies. 2023, 36 (1), 317-350. | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 36 | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 1 | en_US |